|
SHOULDER
MDI ATRAUMATIC - OVERVIEW
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
Shoulder
Multi-Directional Instability - Atraumatic
|
-
Shoulder instability
develops in two different ways: traumatic onset (related to a
sudden injury) or atraumatic onset (not related to a sudden
injury).
-
Understanding the differences is essential in choosing the best
course of treatment.
-
As a rule, the patient with atraumatic onset
instability has general laxity (looseness) in the joint that
eventually causes the shoulder to become unstable, whereas traumatic
onset instability begins when an injury causes a shoulder to develop
recurrent (repeated) dislocations.
-
Atraumatic shoulder instability,
also called multidirectional instability (MDI), is described as laxity
of the shoulder's glenohumeral joint in multiple directions.
-
The
shoulder is the most mobile joint in the human body with a complex
arrangement of structures working together to provide the movement
necessary for daily life. Unfortunately, this great mobility comes at
the expense of stability.
-
Four bones and a network of soft tissues
(ligaments, tendons, and muscles), work together to produce shoulder
movement. They interact to keep the joint in place while it moves
through extreme ranges of motion. Each of these structures makes an
important contribution to shoulder movement and stability.
-
Certain work
or sports activities can put great demands upon the shoulder, and injury
can occur when the limits of movement are exceeded and/or the individual
structures are overloaded.
|
|
What is atraumatic shoulder instability?
|
-
Atraumatic
shoulder instability develops in patients who have increased looseness
of the supporting ligaments that surround the shoulder's glenohumeral
joint.
-
The laxity can be a natural condition (present from birth) or a
condition that has developed over time. Many patients with MDI are
active in overhead sports (such as gymnastics, swimming, or throwing)
that repetitively stretch the shoulder capsule to extreme ranges of
motion.
-
The glenoid (the socket of the shoulder joint) is a relatively
flat surface that is deepened slightly by the labrum, a cartilage
cup that surrounds part of the head of the humerus. The labrum acts as a
bumper to keep the humeral head firmly in place in the glenoid. It is
also the attachment point for important ligaments that stabilize the
shoulder. These ligaments often become stretched out with MDI,
allowing dislocation or subluxation (an incomplete or partial
dislocation) to occur. The increased motion of the joint can lead to
repetitive microtrauma (small injuries), producing tears of the
labrum or rotator cuff.
-
MDI patients will often have increased ligament laxity in many joints.
Hyperextended knees, elbows, and a self-described history of being
"double-jointed" are common. These patients often have
multidirectional laxity in both shoulders. Because many athletes with
MDI are quite successful in their sports, there is a debate about
whether laxity improves performance or is caused by repetitive
stretching during athletic activity.
|
|
Symptoms
|
|
MDI problems are generally
related to recurrent episodes of dislocation.
-
Repeated subluxations
often cause patients to be apprehensive about performing certain
daily activities.
-
Vague symptoms are
described, such as an indistinct pain in the shoulder. Patients may
sense that something is not quite right with the shoulder during
activities when the arm is in certain positions.
-
There may be pain
caused by inflammation in the joint.
-
Patients may show
signs of labrum and/or rotator cuff injuries that have resulted from
the increased movement in the joint.
|
|
Diagnosis
|
|
A thorough history and physical
examination are the keys to the diagnosis and treatment of MDI (Multidirectional
Instability). The classic findings are:
-
a history of
generalized laxity.
-
no history of a
forceful dislocation event.
-
a history of recurrent
episodes of instability.
The patient's history may
reveal a recent injury, an obvious dislocation, or a change in sport or
training that has led to instability in a previously healthy shoulder.
A general examination of joint mobility is very helpful. By moving the
arm around in several positions, the doctor can evaluate full shoulder
motion. Multidirectional laxity may be present in both shoulders even
though only one may be bothersome to the patient. A patient with MDI
has an increase in glenohumeral translation (shoulder joint movement) in
multiple directions, and symptoms can be recreated in one or more
directions. More than 2 cm of movement during the sulcus test
suggests the presence of MDI. The diagnosis of MDI should be based on
this result combined with the evaluation of overall shoulder motion and
the symptoms triggered when the doctor moves the arm in several
directions.
Further evaluation may include some form of visual study of the
shoulder.
-
X-rays are
always obtained, primarily to rule out any associated injuries that
would require treatment. Occasionally the images reveal a congenital
(present since birth) abnormality that may be contributing to the
instability.
-
An MRI (Magnetic
Resonance Image) can reveal other sources of the shoulder pain
that may require more than a rehabilitation program alone for
successful treatment.
-
An arthroscopy
allows the surgeon to visually evaluate the structures of the
glenohumeral joint using a tiny fiberoptic instrument. Other related
injuries may be revealed since increased movement and repetitive
trauma in the joint can lead to injuries of the labrum and partial
thickness rotator cuff tears. With arthroscopy, these injuries
can be treated at the time of the examination, and the patient may
go on to achieve a pain free shoulder with a rehabilitation program.
|
|
Non-Operative Treatment
|
-
Most patients with
MDI can be treated non-operatively with a physical therapy
program that emphasizes muscular rehabilitation.
-
Rehabilitation
focuses on strengthening the rotator cuff muscles and periscapular
muscles (those around the scapula).
-
Strengthening these
muscles provides dynamic stability to the joint, which is
especially important when the static stability provided by the
ligaments is lacking.
-
The vast majority of patients (about 90%) who follow a
rehabilitation program diligently for at least 6 months will
achieve pain relief. Those who continue with a daily or weekly
exercise program as outlined by the doctor are most likely to have
a successful recovery.
-
Athletes may also benefit from sport-specific rehabilitation
that includes technique evaluation and modification. Often this
type of program can help eliminate faulty technique that may have
led to the development of symptoms.
-
Patients who do not get relief from symptoms with a physical
therapy program are a treatment challenge. Only about 70-80% of
these patients eventually achieve long-term stability, with 60-70%
reaching the level of athletic participation they enjoyed prior to
the instability.
|
|
Non-Operative Recovery
|
-
Recovery from MDI
(Multidirectional Instability) is a long process that usually
requires a 6 month physical therapy rehabilitation program. If
this succeeds, an ongoing maintenance program to prevent the
return of instability symptoms is often necessary.
-
If 6 months
of physical therapy has not controlled the instability, surgery
may be indicated.
|
| Operative
Treatment |
- The most challenging
patient to treat surgically is the athlete whose symptoms continue
following a rehabilitation program.
- Often athletes are successful
in their sport because of increased laxity in the joint; so
surgical intervention should only be considered when the patient
has a thorough understanding of MDI, and is aware that stability
with surgical correction is always achieved at the expense of
motion.
- Patients who can voluntarily dislocate the shoulder are
poor surgical candidates; surgery is rarely successful for them.
|
| Traditional
Approach |
|
The traditional
surgery for MDI is designed to make the joint capsule smaller and
reduce glenohumeral movement. This open surgical procedure is
called an extensive inferior capsular release and imbrication.
-
The lower
portion of the joint capsule is cut and overlapped to tighten
the ligaments and make the capsule smaller.
-
During this
procedure, the subscapularis muscle is detached so the surgeon
can access the joint capsule. It is reattached at the end of
the procedure.
-
The success rate
of this procedure is about 75% in a group of carefully
selected individuals (those who were determined to be good
surgical candidates after a careful history and examination). Since
there can be a substantial loss of motion with this procedure,
athletes may not be able to return to competition after
surgery.
|
| Arthroscopic
Techniques |
|
Recently, new
arthroscopic techniques have been developed to correct
multidirectional instability. These arthroscopic
techniques are very exciting, but remain experimental, especially
for athletes who require stability and the preservation of motion.
-
Capsular plication
(a pleating and stitching technique) uses arthroscopic sutures
to reduce the size of the joint capsule.
-
Thermal
capsulorrhaphy is a technique
that uses thermal energy to shrink the capsule. This method is
being evaluated and looks promising, as it is less invasive
and may reduce loss of motion.
|
|
What
types of complications may occur?
|
-
The most common
complication is recurrent instability, which can happen in 20% or
more cases, even with carefully chosen patients.
-
Post-operative
stiffness and loss of motion are also complications; however, loss
of motion is often an acceptable result of achieving stability. An
average loss of motion in external rotation is about 10 degrees. A
loss of motion greater than that occurs in about 5% of the cases.
Other small risks (less than 1%) common to most surgery procedures
include infection, nerve damage, or blood vessel injury.
|
|
Operative Recovery
|
-
For the first 4
to 6 weeks, the patient usually wears a sling to protect the
repair as it heals.
-
During this time
of immobilization, elbow and wrist motion are maintained with
gentle range of motion exercises.
-
Once the initial
healing process is complete, the patient begins a very slow
and progressive physical therapy rehabilitation program to
restore motion and eventually strengthen the shoulder.
-
Patients who
have had open surgical procedures are put on an exercise
program designed to protect the subscapularis muscle from
injury. (This muscle was detached during the procedure to give
the surgeon access to the joint capsule and then reattached at
the end of the procedure.)
-
Patients who
undergo an arthroscopic thermal stabilization treatment
require a longer period of immobilization (often up to 8
weeks) to allow scar tissue to replace the thermally treated
tissue. This scar tissue formation is essential to the
success of this procedure, as the thermally treated tissue is
at risk of stretching.
-
Full
participation in sports is generally restricted for 9 to 12
months following a repair.
|
|
FAQ's
|
| What
is MDI? |
| MDI refers to a
multidirectional laxity of the shoulder joint with associated
instability. The instability generally results from stretching of
the shoulder's supporting ligaments, which leads to increased
movement of the glenohumeral joint.
|
| Will
physical therapy succeed? |
| Research suggests
that many patients (80%) will improve with physical therapy alone.
The patient's diligence and commitment to a daily maintenance
program is required for the best chance of success.
|
| How
much motion loss will I experience if surgery is needed to
stabilize my shoulder? |
| Motion loss varies.
The normal range of shoulder motion at 90 degrees of abduction
(elbow pointing away from the body) is from 80-120 degrees of external
(outward) rotation (the higher number is seen in patients
who have developed increased motion for throwing sports). After a
surgical stabilization, a stable shoulder will have on average
about 90 degrees of external rotation at 90 degrees of abduction.
Preliminary results show that arthroscopic procedures may reduce
motion loss, but these are still being evaluated. |
| If
I don't want a big incision, can this procedure be performed
arthroscopically? |
| Arthroscopic
techniques continue to evolve and improve. The short-term follow
up data suggests that the success rates of arthroscopic repairs
may equal those of open procedures. Although the initial results
are very encouraging, further long-term studies are required to
validate them. |